Skip to content

Conversation

@ilevkivskyi
Copy link
Member

As proposed by @JukkaL in discussion of #2808
Unlike NamedTuple, where the limitation on field names is imposed by underlying collections.namedtuple, here we are free. In case if we decide to include special keyword arguments later, we could just check for those particular names.

@JukkaL
Copy link
Collaborator

JukkaL commented Mar 6, 2017

Thanks for the PR! LGTM

@JukkaL JukkaL merged commit 737ce9e into python:master Mar 6, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants